Posted by Dave Purcell on Jan 10, 2012; 10:20am
URL: http://oldforum.flyshooter.com.au/Draft-of-rule-changes-to-be-submitted-to-National-Committee-tp5118446p5133812.html

Jeff,

Whilst I am interested in the idea of adjustable rear rests I am happy to keep them in the 1000yd arena, if that as you suggest means I am backward then I suppose I am backward.
I dont see any need for the introduction of adjustable rear rests and I have been shooting this event in HG for a little while now.
Thats my opinion just like I dont think a one piece rest should be legal .. remember that rules are funny things what you see as reasonable and commit to as a rule may not be everyone elses interpretation.
There is and always will be those who take every rule to breaking point to gain an advantage ( real or perceived) your suggestion may not pan out in practice as you intend in planning .. think I am wrong ask a few people.
IBS allows adjsutable rear rests and muzzle breaks Fly does not its that simple. Will a change in Fly rules to that effect increase numbers ? Since most 1k BR shooters in Australia shoot Fly already I dont see any benefit in increased numbers.
If you want to build a rifle thats purely for 1k then good on you but that does not make it a majority call.
I have not commented prior because I saw no need but apparently this is serious and I need to record my objection.

Have a Nice Day